ArchivesSpace Public Interface

Collaborative Telehealth Approach Where Traditional Care Fails: Diabetes Care Network Edit

Summary

Identifier
190 - 01 - 04 - Collaborative Telehealth Approach

Dates

  • 2021 (Creation)

Extents

  • 1 Files (Whole)

Agent Links

Subjects

Notes

  • Physical Characteristics and Technical Requirements

    Available only in electronic format.

  • Scope and Contents

    Publisher: Edinboro, Pa. : Edinboro University of Pennsylvania ; Clarion, Pa. : Clarion University of Pennsylvania

    Publicaton Date: 2021

    Format: 1 online resource (32 pages) text file PDF

    Description:

    Clinical inertia is the failure to initiate or intensify treatment in a timely manner in people with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in primary care (PC) where collaborative care can be an approach to overcome inertia. Diabetes care network (DCN) is a telehealth based collaborative care model to address clinical inertia in the PC environment. In DCN, initial care was delivered via E-Consult by hub diabetes team for Veterans with A1c of 9% or higher and the longitudinal collaborative care delivered by PC liaison with weekly team huddle. To study the difference in the clinical outcomes with DCN vs PC practices, we compared the DCN cohort (97.7% male, 90.8% white, with a mean age 67.2 (8.9), with a PC cohort (100% male, 94.9% white, mean age: 68 year (10.5), with A1C >9%). Methods: Means (SD), frequencies. and percentages were presented. The DCN cohort had a significant decline in the baseline A1C of 10.2% (1.4), to 8.1% (0.99), 7.6% (0.96), 7.5 % (0.86) at 3, 6, and 12 months while A1c in PC cohort stayed poor with baseline A1C of 10.1% (0.89), to 10.2% (1.69), 9.7% (1.74) and, 9.5% (1.83) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients who achieved A1c less than 8% in DCN cohort were 38 (43.6%), 56 (64%), and 56 (64%) at 3, 6, and 12 months and were 1(1.7%), 5(8.5%), and 6(10.2%) at 3, 6, and 12 months in PC cohort. An A1c of less than 7% was achieved in DCN cohort in 10 (11.4%), 21 (24.1%), and 23 (26.4%) patients at 3, 6, and 12 months and only 1(1.7%), 0(0%), and 0(0%) patients achieved A1c less than 7% at 3, 6, and 12 months in PC cohort. Our study shows participation in the DCN telehealth program for 1 year was associated with significant improvement in A1c. This improvement was not seen within the PC with traditional care practices. Thus, addressing clinical inertia in PC will need a paradigm shift in current practices. The proposed collaborative approach of DCN can overcome clinical inertia in PC and improve care for people with T2D by supporting PC access to specialty care expertise, decreasing the burden of diabetes care for patients and PC providers.

External Documents

Components